Anderson v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1910
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1948
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kohn v. McNulta · Wood v. Heiges
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is no evidence whatever to show that such implements are usually employed for this purpose, or that the method adopted is not the customary one. * * * The method employed was the most ancient known. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.