Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 Ariz. 457 - Ellison v. Schuster

Ellison v. Schuster’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
April 1995
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently April 1995 · most notably Lane Title and Trust Company v. Brannan (1968), Carrillo v. Taylor (1956)

4 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

8019291930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McFadden v. McFadden · Tevis v. Ryan · Thomas v. Newcomb · Costello v. Cunningham · First Baptist Church v. Connor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is also the rule on appeal that we will assume the trial court found every fact necessary to support its orders and judgment, and that every conflict in the testimony will be resolved in favor of such findings, actual or presumed." (Citing cases.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.