Undernehr v. Sandlin’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited
1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cooper v. Lee · Sutton v. Lee · Liggett v. Church of Nazarene · Moseley v. Moon · Dalton v. Polster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... [A] description of land in a tax deed is sufficient if the description itself furnishes a key through which the land may be definitely located by proof aliunde. Kelly v. Salinger, 53 Ark. 114 , 13 S.W. 596 ; Lonergan v. Baber, 59 Ark. 15 , 26 S.W.13; Buckner v. Sugg, 79 Ark. 442 , 96 S.W. 184 . Of course the converse of this proposition is trae. That is to say, extrinsic evidence is not admissible to cure or perfect a description which in itself is void and offers no key or suggestion by which the land may be located.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Payton v. Blake
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.