Neise v. Krumacker’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1964
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Massie v. Watts · Independent Coal & Coke Co. v. United States · Bullock v. Bullock · Dean v. Anderson · 134 N.J. Eq. 513 - Strong v. Strong
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * Where such instruments [a bond and mortgage] are assigned for a specific purpose, they must be applied exclusively to that purpose and any other unauthorized disposition of them is essentially a fraudulent misappropriation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.