Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 CAL2D 263 - Veriddo v. Renaud

Veriddo v. Renaud’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 2004 · most notably 32 Cal. 4th 1234 - State v. Superior Court (2004), 32 Cal. App. 3d 688 - Bozaich v. State of California (1973)

34 state decisions

180195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Artukovich v. Astendorf · Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation District · Mock v. City of Santa Rosa · Payne v. Baehr · 77 Cal. App. 2d 383 - Huffaker v. Decker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whenever it is claimed that any person has been injured or any property damage as the result of the negligence or carelessness of any public officer or employee occurring during the course of his service or employment ... within 90 days after the accident has occurred a verified claim for damages shall be presented in writing and filed with the officer or employee and the clerk or secretary of the legislative body of the ... municipality ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “has extended to public officers and employees, who incur liability in the performance of government service, the protection of a claims statute and the privilege of having defended at public expense those damage suits which are enumerated”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “if compliance with ... provisions [of Government Code section 1981] is not a prerequisite to suit against ... [the public employes named therein], then the section appears to be wholly meaningless ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.