Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 CAL2D 455 - People v. Chessman

People v. Chessman’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

114
cited by 114 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
September 1998
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 89 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 114 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1998 · most notably 1 Cal. 4th 1132 - People v. Howard (1992), 77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 25 - People v. Frye (1998)

15 federal appellate · 89 state decisions

44019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Malony v. Adsit · 89 Cal. App. 2d 467 - People v. Ford · People v. Angelopoulus · 76 Cal. App. 178 - People v. Adams · 60 Cal. App. 2d 133 - People v. Lynch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]nconsequential inaccuracies or omissions in a record cannot prejudice a party; if in truth there does exist some consequential inaccuracy or omission, the appellant must show what it is and why it is consequential.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`that life without possibility of parole doesn't mean that at all, and that the jury should and must return the death penalty because otherwise there was imminent danger the defendant again would be loosed by a lax administration of the law to prey upon society because the defendant was a cunning individual who knew the angles.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “prepared in such a manner as to enable the court to pass upon the questions sought to be raised,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.