In Re Etherington’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 1992
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Millard v. Supreme Council of American Legion of Honor · People v. Hartman · 74 Cal. App. 2d 810 - In Re Ortiz · 84 Cal. App. 2d 746 - In Re Staser · 99 Cal. App. 660 - Estate of Ingram
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That the allegations as contained in the petition filed on the 2nd day of July, 1951, are true and because of the conduct on the part of the said minor, he.is in need of the control and supervision of the Juvenile Court and in further need of some type of twenty-four hour supervision and training, and is a person coming within the provisions of Subdivision M of Section 700 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Barajas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.