35 Cal. App. 44 - Marks v. Reissinger’s Empirical Analysis
1917
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently September 2010 · most notably 6 Cal. 3d 150 - Kaplan v. Superior Court (1971), 18 Cal. 3d 646 - Larcher v. Wanless (1976)
6 federal appellate · 41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Munro v. Pacific Coast Dredging & Reclamation Co. · Earley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co. · Burk v. Arcata & Mad River Railroad · Lange v. Schoettler · Clopton v. Clopton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . statutes like section 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure . . . create a right entirely distinct from that which was vested in the injured person before his death.” 172 Cal. 414 . “ . .. (this) section ... creates a right entirely distinct from that which was vested in the injured person before his death.” 39 Cal. App. 377 . “A totally new action is given against the person who would have been responsible to the deceased if the deceased had lived — an action which ... is new in its species, new in its quality, new in its principle, in every way new, and which can only be brought if there is any person answering the description of the window, parent, or child, who, under such circumstances, suffers pecuniary loss.” 35 Cal. App. 44, 53 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Izquierdo v. Andrade
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.