Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 Colo. App. 46 - Oldis v. Grosse-Rhode

35 Colo. App. 46 - Oldis v. Grosse-Rhode’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
4
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

2 district · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably 89 Ill. App. 3d 304 - In Re Marriage of Dulyn (1980), Moss v. Moss (1976)

2 district · 35 state decisions

20019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on American Mining Co. v. Himrod-Kimball Mines Co. · Perino v. Jarvis · Cherrington v. Woods · Grooms v. Rice · Briano v. Rubio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . . the amount stated as liquidated damages must be reasonable and proportionate to the presumed injury. . “However, the provision under consideration here provides that all payments made by the buyer, regardless of whether they constitute one percent or ninety-nine percent of the total purchase price, must be forfeited by the buyer in the event of any default of payment or breach of any of the covenants. ... we hold that the liquidated damages provision demonstrates, by its own terms, that its enforcement under many circumstances may result in an unconscionable forfeiture. Therefore, the liquidated damages provision is void and unenforceable.” Oldis v. Grosse-Rhode, 35 Colo.App. 46 , 528 P.2d 944, 947 (1974). (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.