35 Conn. Super. Ct. 679 - Ferro v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 1996
most recently cited
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · Boddie v. Connecticut · Armstrong v. Manzo · United States v. Kras · Ortwein v. Schwab
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an affirmative selection of words with a specific intent to make use of each word's distinctive meaning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]f read according to the commonly approved usage of its language, the statute then speaks for itself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he costs of making such tests shall be chargeable against the party making the motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Little v. Streater
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.