Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 DEL 169 - Creadick v. Keller

Creadick v. Keller’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
5
states following
June 1987
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 1987

6 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

50193219401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Derrickson v. Bannett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t would create an intolerable situation if the defendant could, by his own wilful act, or refusal to act, prevent the plaintiff from maintaining his action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.