Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 F.1d 152 - Hall v. Sims

Hall v. Sims’s Empirical Analysis

35 F. 152 · 1888

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
August 1929
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. Derby · New Jersey Steamboat Co. v. Brockett · Riley v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not at all necessary to consider here the question whether a eourt of admiralty proceeds against the owner of a vessel upon distinct grounds of its own growing out of the peculiar relations that exist as between the owner and those éngaged about navigating a vessel of commerce, in cases like this, or only enforces the ordinary common-law principles of master and servant; for it is conceded by the learned counsel that the defendant is liable on the common-law principle, and to that extent certainly; and, I find no difficulty in adjudging that this case falls clearly within that principle. * * * But, after all, this case falls, in my judgment, within the Tennessee rule of liability. * * * »”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.