American Eagle Fire Ins. v. Vaughan’s Empirical Analysis
35 F.2d 147 · 1929
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1937
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commercial Bank v. Burgwyn · Humble v. German Alliance Insurance · Nelson v. Atlanta Home Insurance · Booth v. Concordia Fire Ins.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The case, therefore, falls clearly within the rule that the clause of insurance policies forbidding the taking of other or additional insurance is not violated where one other than the insured procures a policy in the latter’s name without his knowledge, acquiescence, or ratification.” (p. 149.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.