Bank of Hampton v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
35 F.2d 321 · 1929
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2009
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bailey v. Baker Ice Machine Co. · Bank of Weiner v. Jonesboro Trust Company · O'Neill v. Lyric Amusement Co. · Bunch v. Maloney · In re T. H. Bunch Commission Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“literal use of the statutory language is not requisite” and that an acknowledgment will be sufficient if”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.