Moore v. Silverstein’s Empirical Analysis
35 F.2d 497 · 1929
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
June 1936
most recently cited
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Sheffield & Birmingham Coal, Iron & Railway Co. v. Gordon · McCourt v. Singers-Bigger · In re Leslie · Merritt v. Peters · Setgel v. Cartel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Although we have thus sufficiently disposed of the points raised by appellant, we would also call attention to the fact that the statement on appeal settled by the trial judge and contained in the record not only does not affirmatively show that it contains all the evidence, which failure alone would require an affirmance of the order (Sheffield, etc., Ry. Co. v. Gordon, 151 U. S. 285 , 14 S. Ct. 343 , 38 L. Ed. 164 ), but also it affirmatively shows that there was 'a mass of evidence before the special master which is not contained in the statement on appeal.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.