Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 F.2d 620 - Aiken v. Commissioner

Aiken v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

35 F.2d 620 · 1929

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
December 1968
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1968

4 federal appellate ·

5019291930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1057 · 26 U.S.C. § 1061 (§ 13309 of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017)

Relies on Bowers v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co. · E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. Davis · Bedell v. Commissioner · Loewer Realty Co. v. Anderson · Howard v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The $50,000 paid during the year 1916, although a part of $1,250,000 that was finally paid, was not income merely because it was a payment, for the reason that, until the entire amount had been paid, the gain could not be computed.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.