Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 F.3d 1171 - Kernats v. O'Sullivan

Kernats v. O'Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

35 F.3d 1171 · 1994

Citation profile

144
cited by 144 later decisions
March 2025
most recently cited

62 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 144 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Bennett v. City of Eastpointe (2005), Willie Jacobs and Linda Siller v. City of Chicago (2000)

62 federal appellate · 1 district ·

9101994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 144 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he contours of the right [are] sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[u]nder this test, a fleeing suspect--even one who is confronted with an obvious show of authority--is not seized until his freedom of movement is terminated by intentional application of physical force or by the suspect's submission to the asserted authority.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “government officials performing discretionary functions, generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.