Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 F.3d 1208 - United States v. Mounts

United States v. Mounts’s Empirical Analysis

35 F.3d 1208 · 1994

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

58 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably United States v. Moore (1997), United States v. Maloney (1995)

58 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

500199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1621 · 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Olano · Johnson v. Zerbst · Zafiro v. United States · United States v. Dunnigan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'only if the government violated Rule 16 and the remedy offered by the district court was inadequate to provide him with a fair trial.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In conducting our review, we give particular deference to the district court which had the opportunity to hear the testimony and observe the demeanor of the witnesses.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a defendant must object, on the record, to the judge's refusal to tender the defendant's instructions, and must clearly state the reasons for his or her objection.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.