In Re Raymond Clay and Scott Clay, D/B/A the Emporium’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably McFarland v. Leyh (1995), United States v. Dees (1997)
4 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Vandygriff v. Phillips · United States v. Raddatz · Crowell v. Benson · Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] cold record cannot capture the atmosphere, the expressions, the attitudes that are the marrow of a jury trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[a] court must not interpret a statute in a way that raises constitutional questions if a reasonable alternative construction poses no such problems.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Ruiz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.