Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 F.3d 229 - Lancaster v. Presley

Lancaster v. Presley’s Empirical Analysis

35 F.3d 229 · 1994

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2016

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

70199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · John T. Fackelman v. Griffin B. Bell, Attorney General · Central Jersey Industries, Inc. v. United States Railway Ass'n · Shelvin v. Inland Well Service, Inc. · 472 So. 2d 363 - Lancaster v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In effect, Lancaster asks the district court to use Rule 60(b)(6) to overturn this Court's dismissal of his appeal. Quite obviously, the district court lacks jurisdiction to overturn an order of this Court. Rule 60(b)(6) was not intended as a remedy for all wrongs, and certainly does not confer super-appellate jurisdiction on the district court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Cascade Energy & Metals Corporation v. Jeffrey G. Banks, the and Judgment Creditors Herein Associate Gold Technics Dfts, and Interphase Corporation W. David Weston Telegraph Mine Limited Stephen W. Rupp, Trustee of the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Estate of Rex Montis Silver Co. v. Rex Montis Silver Company, Cross-Claim-Defendant-Appellant. Cascade Energy & Metals Corporation, Delano S. Findlay v. Banks, the and Judgment Creditors Herein Rex Montis Silver Company Interphase Corporation W. David Weston Telegraph Mine Limited Stephen W. Rupp, Trustee of the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Estate of Rex Montis Silver Company, Associate Gold Technics Dfts, Cascade Energy & Metals Corporation v. Banks, the and Judgment Creditors Herein Rex Montis Silver Company Interphase Corporation W. David Weston Stephen W. Rupp, Trustee of the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Estate of Rex Montis Silver Company, Associate Gold Technics Dfts v. Telegraph Mine Limited, and Telegraph Mine Joint Venture, Cross-Claim-Defendants-Appellants. Cascade Energy & Metals Corporation v. Banks, the and Judgment Creditors Herein Rex Montis Silver Company Interphase Corporation W. David Weston Telegraph Mine Limited Stephen W. Rupp, Trustee of the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Estate of Rex Montis Silver Co., Associate Gold Technics Dfts, Cascade Energy & Metals Corporation v. Banks, the and Judgment Creditors Herein Associate Interphase Corporation Stephen W. Rupp, Trustee of the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Estate of Rex Montis Silver Co., Gold Technics Dfts, Rex Montis Silver Company W. David Weston Telegraph Mine Limited, Cross-Claim-Defendants-Appellees. Cascade Energy & Metals Corporation v. Banks, the and Judgment Creditors Herein Rex Montis Silver Company Interphase Corporation Telegraph Mine Limited Stephen W. Rupp, Trustee of the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Estate of Rex Montis Silver Co. Estate of Bernard Hodowski, and Associate Gold Technics Dfts Sam Harmatz A.C. Nejedly Rosalie Donahey Chris Waugh H.E. Moses Estate of Joe F. Duncan Eliot Weinberg v. W. David Weston, Cross-Claim-Defendant-Appellant · 961 So. 2d 768 - Lancaster v. Stevens
  2. “'[T]o overturn the district court's denial of [a] Rule 60(b) motion, it is not enough that a grant of the motion might have been permissible or warranted; rather, the decision to deny the motion must have been sufficiently unwarranted as to amount to an abuse of discretion.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We have consistently held that the simple failure of the clerk to mail notice of the entry of judgment, without more, does not permit relief to a party who has failed to appeal within the prescribed time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.