Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

35 F. App'x 100

Nicholson-El v. Conley

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided May 23, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-05-23

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-05-23

*101 PER CURIAM.

¶1 William E. Nicholson-El appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nicholson-El v. Conley, No. CA-01-798 (S.D.W.Va. Jan. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/35/fappx/100 · .json · Public domain