¶1 Randall Johnson appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. For the reasons stated by the district court, we agree that the state court’s decision was neither contrary to nor an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
35 F. App'x 420
Randall Johnson v. Larry Rowley
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided May 23, 2002
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-05-23
Cited by 2 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2002
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2002-05-23
View the full empirical analysis of this case →