Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

35 F. App'x 58

Arnold v. Marles

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided May 6, 2002

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-05-06

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2003

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-05-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1James Guy Arnold appeals the district court orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petitions in these consolidated cases. We find Arnold’s appeals to be moot. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals. Further, we deny Arnold’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2DISMISSED.

/35/fappx/58 · .json · Public domain