35 Fed. Cl. 309 - Conoco Inc. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2015
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1437 · 12 U.S.C. § 1464 · 33 U.S.C. § 2753 · 43 U.S.C. § 1301 · 43 U.S.C. § 1331 · 43 U.S.C. § 1332 · 43 U.S.C. § 1334 · 43 U.S.C. § 1337
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. · Thompson v. Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) to study the impact of any proposed OCS development, see OBPA § 6003(c)(3)(A). 14 Specifically, the OBPA prohibited DOI from approving any POEs, PODs, or permits to drill on the North Carolina OCS until the later of October 1, 1991, or forty-five days of continuous congressional session following DOI's receipt of an ESRP report and submission of a certificate by the Secretary reporting that he had sufficient information to carry out his responsibilities under the OCSLA, see id. § 6003(c)(3)(A)(ii)(I). In light of the enactment of the OBPA, the Mineral Management Service (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“compliance with the OBPA compelled governmental breach by non-performance accompanied by an anticipatory repudiation thereby giving rise to 'total breach.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“failure [to carry out its contractual obligations], under the restrictions adopted pursuant to the OBPA, was a material breach of the leases,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.