In re Chrisman’s Empirical Analysis
1940
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2013
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Prutsman v. Baker · Craig v. White · Walker v. Houston · In re Lake's Laundry, Inc. · 109 Cal. App. 489 - Early v. Owens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In California, as elsewhere, delivery of an instrument in escrow conveys no title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Addie v. Kjaer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.