35 F. Supp. 2d 331 - Reynolds v. Giuliani’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 607 (§ 407 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 608 (§ 408 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 9202
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Goldberg v. Kelly · Kentucky v. Graham · Dandridge v. Williams · Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“• Procedures to permit applicants to file an application for food stamps, Medicaid or cash assistance on the first day of contact with a Job Center; • Procedures for separate determinations on an applicant’s request for food stamps, Medicaid and cash assistance; • Procedures for processing applications for expedited food stamps within seven days from the date the application is submitted; • Procedures for processing applications for pre-investigation immediate needs cash assistance in a manner consistent with State law; • Procedures for processing applications for food stamps and/or Medicaid where applicants fail to comply with work requirements; [and] • Procedures for providing written notice to applicants denied food stamps, Medicaid and/or cash assistance together with the basis for those denials and an opportunity to request a fair hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“• allow plaintiffs and all persons applying for food stamps, Medicaid and cash assistance, including expedited food stamps and temporary pre-in-vestigation grants to apply for such benefits on the first day that they visit a Job Center; • process all applications for expedited food stamps and temporary pre-in-vestigation grants at Job Centers within the time frames required by law; • make eligibility determinations regarding food stamps and Medicaid applications at Job Centers separate from the eligibility determinations regarding cash assistance applications; and ® send plaintiffs and all persons applying for food stamps, Medicaid and cash assistance, including expedited food stamps and temporary pre-in-vestigation grants at Job Centers timely and adequate written notice of determinations of their eligibility for all benefits which they seek.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a State agency — (i) shall provide timely, accurate, and fair service to applicants for, and participants in, the food stamp program; (ii) shall develop an application containing the information necessary to comply with this chapter; (iii) shall permit an applicant household to apply to participate in the program on the same day that the household first contacts a food stamp office in person during office hours; (iv) shall consider an application that contains the name, address, and signature of the applicant to be filed on the date the applicant submits the application.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Meachem v. Wing
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.