Simonds v. Hoover’s Empirical Analysis
1871
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1995
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brooster v. State · Hooker v. State ex rel. Haynes · Amick v. O'Hara · Casteel v. Casteel · White v. Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Law and morals ... alike forbid that a man shall be the agent of two persons, and receive pay from both, ... where their interests are antagonistic.... [H]e is not likely to discharge his duty with fidelity to both.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Egan v. Burkhart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.