Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 MICH 155 - Thomas v. Gain

Thomas v. Gain’s Empirical Analysis

1876

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
18
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

1 district · 46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2007 · most notably Hagar v. (1884), Norwood v. Baker (1898)

1 district · 46 state decisions — followed in 18 states

14018761880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The idea that underlies statutes for this purpose is, that the benefit to the abutting lots is generally in proportion to the length of their respective fronts, and that as a rule this principle of apportionment is more just than any other. There is a basis of truth to this idea, and it is so generally accepted that assessments for street improvements are perhaps now more generally apportioned by the frontage than by any other standard.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.