Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

35 Mich. 189

Berry v. Innes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1876

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1876-10-25

Appeal in Chancery from Kent Circuit. This is an appeal from an order adjudging defendant Innes guilty of contempt for disobedience of a decree requiring him to execute, acknowledge, and deliver to complainant a deed of the premises in suit.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1938

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1876-10-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam:

¶1The order adjudging the defendant guilty of contempt was unwarranted. The defendant could not he guilty of contempt until a deed had been presented to him for execution and he had refused to execute it. He was not bound at his peril to prepare and execute such a deed as the decree called for.

¶2But we also think the decree could not lawfully have been amended without notice; and though the amendment could not injure this defendant, yet as the decree itself appears to he in some particulars not warranted by the case made, we think the defendant should he allowed to take advantage of the error. The order appealed from will therefore be reversed, with costs, and leave given to file a hill of review. If the parties cannot now agree what their respective rights are, and settle them without further litigation, Nixon, Ernst, and the Trills ought in some manner to be brought before the court.

/35/mich/189 · .json · Public domain