Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 MINN 331 - Geib v. Reynolds

Geib v. Reynolds’s Empirical Analysis

1886

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
17
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably Emmert v. Thompson (1892), Tolman v. Smith (1890)

2 federal appellate · 49 state decisions — followed in 17 states

12018861890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barnes v. . Mott · D. Morrison & Co. v. Lovejoy · Wyche v. Greene · Cobb v. Dyer · State ex rel. Attorney General v. Southern Minnesota Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the holder of a mortgage take a new mortgage as a substitute for a former one, and cancel and release the latter in ignorance of the existence of an intervening lien upon the mortgaged premises, equity will, in the absence of some special disqualifying fact, restore the lien of the first mortgage, and give it its original priority.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““When a prior mortgage has been, by fraud or mistake, discharged of record, a subsequent mortgagee, who became such anterior to such discharge, cannot claim to be injured by setting aside the release, and restoring the mortgagee to his rights.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.