¶1The defendant received no title to the merchandise under the insolvent assignment, because his assignors had no title thereto, it appearing that the goods were delivered to them on memorandum. Thé defendant, when he refused to surrender possession to the true owners, became liable individually, after demand was made. No exception is presented which affects the original disposition' made of the case.
¶2Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.
¶3Judgment affirmed, with costs.