Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

35 Misc. 832

Hughes v. Martin

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1901-06-15

<p>Appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, second district, borough of Manhattan.</p>

Decided 1901-06-15

Per Curiam.

¶1The indisputable evidence showed that defendant, under an assumed name, employed the plaintiff as a broker in realty to perform services for him. Those services were rendered, and the defendant failed to. pay the regular commission. We think the judgment awarded for such commission is correct.

¶2Present: Scott, P. T., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

¶3Judgment affirmed, with costs.

/35/misc/832 · .json · Public domain