Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

35 Miss. 197

Edwards v. Smith

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1858

Mississippi Supreme Court · decided 1858-04-15

<p>Will : instrument not designed as such not admissible to probate. — An instrument intended by the maker to operate as a deed, will not be entitled to probate as a will, although it may be inoperative as a deed.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1904

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1858-04-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The question in this case is whether the instrument admitted to probate, as the last will and testament of L. F. Henderson,‘deceased, was designed by the deceased to operate as a will, or as a deed.

¶2We are of opinion that it was intended to operate as a deed, and whether it can so operate or not, it cannot be regarded as a will, for the reason that it was not designed as such.

¶3Decree reversed.

/35/miss/197 · .json · Public domain