Adams v. Trigg

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 15, 1864

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1864-07-15

<p>Judgment — Practice.—No final judgment in the case. (Young y. Stonehreaker, 33 Mo. 117, affirmed.)</p>

Relies on Young v. Stonebreaker

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1864-07-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1909

5 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Bates, Judge,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2There is no final judgment in this case. The record shows a trial and a verdict for the defendant, and proceeds as follows : “ It is therefore considered by the court that the defendant recover of the plaintiff the costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf sustained, and that he have thereof his execution.” There is no “ final determination of the rights of the parties in the action. (Young v. Stonebreaker and others, 33 Mo. 117.)

¶3The writ of error is therefore dismissed.

Judge Dryden concurs ; Judge Bay absent.