Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 N.J. Super. 103 - State v. Steensen

35 N.J. Super. 103 - State v. Steensen’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
8
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably State v. Reyes (1967), State v. La Porte (1973)

41 state decisions

1301955196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Michelson v. United States · State v. Hauptmann · State v. Spruill · Chicago Great Western Co v. Basham · Bowers v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) that there is no question as to the fact of the subject matter of the rumor, that is, of the previous arrest, conviction, or other pertinent misconduct of the defendant;”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he trial court should conduct a preliminary inquiry out of the presence of the jury so as to insure (a) that the alleged misconduct is actual; (b) that it is reasonably likely that it was the subject of the rumor in the community; (c) that it is not too remote and that it was of the same character as the act on trial. The trial judge should also ... see to it that the question is properly formed, that is, "Have you heard?" and that the jury is instructed at the time as to the limited purpose of the inquiry.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “To thus digress from evidence as to the offense to hear a contest as to the standing of the accused, at its best opens a tricky line of inquiry as to a shapeless and elusive subject matter. At its worst it opens a veritable Pandora’s box of irresponsible gossip, innuendo, and smear.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.