Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 N.M. 173 - Conley v. Davidson

Conley v. Davidson’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
June 1990
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 1990 · most notably Aboud v. Adams (1973), Viramontes v. Fox (1959)

26 state decisions

601930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adams v. Blumenshine · Ortega v. Ortega · Crenshaw v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The general rule is that the purchaser is entitled, as general damages for the refusal or inability of the vendor to convey, to recover the difference between the actual value of the land and the agreed price to be paid therefor. This is generally known as the loss. of bargain rule. 27 R.C.L. 631, § 388. This rule when applied to contracts for exchange of land where neither party has conveyed is stated as follows: Plaintiff is permitted to recover the difference between the value of the land which he was to convey and that which he was to receive. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.