Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 N.M. 307 - Reed v. Sibley

Reed v. Sibley’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 1962
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 1962

3 state decisions

101931194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brannin v. Bremen · Current v. Citizens' Bank · M'Veigh v. Veig

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When on the whole record we see that injustice has not been done a defendant, it would be going too far to deprive a plaintiff of a recovery upon no better grounds than the bare informality of a verdict.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.