Andre v. Pomeroy’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
December 1998
most recently cited
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wagner v. International Railway Co. · Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. · Sadowski v. Long Island R.R. Co. · Tedla v. Ellman · Mink v. Keim
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only in cases in which there is no conflict at all in the evidence, the defendant's conduct fell far below any permissible standard of due care, and the plaintiff's conduct either was not really involved [such as with a passenger] or was clearly of exemplary prudence in the circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to ferret out speculative issues `to get the case to the jury' where the trial may disclose something the pretrial proceedings have not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.