Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 NY2D 425 - Fuller v. Preis

Fuller v. Preis’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
7
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

6 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably District of Columbia v. Peters (1987), Freyermuth v. Lutfy (1978)

6 district · 24 state decisions

15019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Milks v. McIver · Stephenson v. State · Dunham v. Village of Canisteo · Sagorsky v. Malyon · 13 E.H. Smith 400 - People v. . Rice

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In tort law, there is a recognition that one may retain the power to intend and yet be subject to an irresistible impulse.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Rd v. Wh

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.