35 Ohio App. 3d 110 - Norris v. Weir’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
May 2005
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ross v. Bernhard · duPont v. Wyly · Davis v. Comed, Inc. · Gries Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. Cleveland Browns Football Co. · Seiden v. Nicholson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“{¶ 13} “The sole issue before this court is whether appellant met the requirement under Civ.R. 23.1 that it fairly and adequately represents the interests of similarly situated shareholders. Civ.R. 23.1 states: {¶ 14} “The derivative action may not be maintained if it appears that the plaintiff does not fairly and adequately represent the interests of the shareholders similarly situated in enforcing the right of the corporation.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.