35 Ohio App. 3d 47 - Lee v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
56 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Koss (1990), 75 Ohio App. 3d 219 - State v. Coulter (1992)
56 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schaffter v. Ward
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the witness is not testifying as an expert, his testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those opinions or inferences which are (1) rationally based on the perception of the witness and (2) helpful to a clear understanding of his testimony or the determination of a fact in issue.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'one that a rational person would form on the basis of the observed facts.'”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Testimony in the form óf an opinion or inference otherwise admissible is not objectionable solely because it embraces an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sanfrey v. USM Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.