Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 OHIOST2D 1 - State v. Carmichael

State v. Carmichael’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
9
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

73 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably 76 Ill. 2d 289 - People v. Taylor (1979), 112 Ohio App. 3d 521 - State v. Hopfer (1996)

73 state decisions

210197319801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gault · Pointer v. Texas · Kent v. United States · In re Agler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * However, the test the court is to apply under the statute is whether ‘there are reasonable grounds to believe that * * Thus, the ‘investigation’ is not required to show that the child cannot be rehabilitated as a juvenile but only that there are reasonable grounds to believe that he cannot be rehabilitated.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is not necessary to determine that the child is not amenable to care or rehabilitation in an institution for delinquent children. Rather the court must determine that there are reasonable grounds to believe such is the case”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(b) There is probable cause to believe that the child committed the act alleged;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.