Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

35 Okla. 11

128 P 111

Duffield v. Ingraham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1912

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1912-11-16

<p> Error from Pawnee County Court; H. T. Conley, Judge. </p> <p>Action between N. R. Duffield and M. F. Ingraham. From the judgment, Duffield brings error.</p>

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1934

3 state decisions

Relies on J. W. Ripey Son v. the Art Wall Paper Mill

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed and remanded · Decided 1912-11-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DUNN, J.

¶1 This case presents error from the county court of Pawnee county. Subsequent to the denial of the motion for new trial, November 3, 1909, and during the time for service of the case-made, Judge PI. T. Conley, the trial judge, died. Thereafter the case-made was settled by County Judge N. E. Mc-Neill' and filed in this court. After the rendition of the case of J. W. Ripey & Son v. Art Wall Paper Mill Co., 27 Okla. 600, 112 Pac. 1119, decided on the 16th day of 'November, 19Í0, and invoking the rule therein laid down, counsel for plaintiff in error presented evidence showing the death of the trial judge on February 2-6, 1910. Under the authority of the above case, there *12 fore, the cause will be remanded to the trial court, with instructions to set aside the judgment heretofore rendered.and grant plaintiff in error a new trial.

PIA YES and KANE, JJ., concur; TURNER, C. J., and WILLIAMS, J., absent, and not participating.
/35/okla/11 · .json · Public domain