Ex Parte Dagley’s Empirical Analysis
1912
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 1971
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Nobles v. State of Georgia · Sporza v. . German Savings Bank · Dowdell · In re Ferrier · In re Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““All persons confined as insane shall be entitled to the benefit of the writ of habeas corpus and the question of insanity shall he decided at the hearing, and if the judge or court shall decide that the person is insane, such decision shall be no bar to the issuing of the writ the second time whenever it shall be alleged that such person has been restored to reason.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ex Parte Gonshor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.