Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

35 Okla. 468

130 P 276

Peck v. Stephens

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1913

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1913-02-11

<p> Error from District Court, Stephens County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. </p> <p>Action between.P. H. Peck and Dan Stephens and others. From the judgment, Peck brings error.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Dismissed · Decided 1913-02-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1943

4 state decisions

301913192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*469 DUNN, J.

¶1 The sufficiency of the purported case-made in the above-entitled proceeding in error, to support the petition in error, is challenged in a motion to dismiss on the ground, among others, that neither the case-made nor a certified copy thereof was filed in the office of the clerk of the district court. The order from which the appeal was sought to be taken was rendered on the 1st day of April, 1912.

¶2 The motion must be sustained; the rule being that the case-made, or a copy thereof, must be filed with the papers in the case in the court below, or it is a nullity, and cannot be considered in this court for the purpose of, reviewing matters complained of in the trial court. See Abbott v. Rodgers, ante, 128 Pac. 908, and cases cited therein.

All the Justices concur.
/35/okla/468 · .json · Public domain