35 Okla. Crim. 263 - Sutton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 1973
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 26 Okla. Crim. 283 - Polk v. State · 20 Okla. Crim. 220 - Goben v. State · 30 Okla. Crim. 243 - Howington v. State · 28 Okla. Crim. 218 - Mullen v. State · 30 Okla. Crim. 56 - Tipton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The right of the accused to the assistance of counsel in making his defense has long been regarded in this country as essential to the due administration of justice in criminal cases. Says Mr. Cooley: “ ‘With .us it is a universal principle of constitutional law that the prisoner shall be allowed a defense by counsel.’ Const. Lim. 334.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Under our laws every person accused of felony is entitled to aid of counsel at every stage of the preceedings, whether imprisoned or admitted to bail, and refusal of opportunity to procure such counsel amounts to a deprivation of a right essential to his safety.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.