Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 SO2D 241 - Hughes v. Will

Hughes v. Will’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2013

9 state decisions

4019481950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rester v. Moody & Stewart · Louisiana Highway Commission v. McCain · National Homestead Ass'n v. Graham · Mercantile Nat. Bank v. J. Thos. Driscoll, Inc. · Colonial Creosoting Co. v. Perry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If liens are to be strictly construed, it is obvious that there must be set forth information as to how the claim arises, against whom it is to be asserted, and the amount thereof.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.