Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 So. 2d 472 - Ledoux v. Beyt

35 So. 2d 472 - Ledoux v. Beyt’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 1962
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 1962

4 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

60194819501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Beach v. Union Brewing Corporation · Bourgeois v. Longman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Melancon, the truck driver, testified that only two or three minutes elapsed between the time he stopped and the time he noticed plaintiff’s car approaching from the rear, and in that interval he could not possibly have displayed the flares which he carried in the truck, as required by the ‘Flare Law’. Whilst the statute uses the word ‘immediately’ in providing how soon ■ after coming to a stop the driver shall display his lighted flares, ordinary rea soning forces the court to take the time involved in getting the flares out; lighting them and placing them on the highway into consideration, as an element in construing what is meant by thd word ‘immediately* and it has been held in certain cases that anywhere from two-to five minutes, depending on the circumstances, is not an unreasonable time to allow for a compliance with the terms of the statute.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.