Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

35 So. 3d 1005

Viera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2010-05-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2012

1 state decisions

Relies on 845 So. 2d 142 - Wilson v. State · State v. Canty · Ducksworth v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-05-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

¶1 This is an appeal from a conviction and a 40 year sentence for trafficking in heroin. We find no trial error and therefore affirm the conviction. However, after consideration of the circumstances surrounding the sentence in light of the factors stated in Wilson v. State, 845 So.2d 142, 156 (Fla.2003), particularly the judge’s enthusiastic advocacy of the State’s pre-trial offer of a ten year sentence in return for a guilty plea, and the unexplained 40 year sentence (the offense carried a 25 year mandatory minimum) which was imposed after the trial which followed the defendant’s rejection of the offer, we must conclude that the sentence was, in legal parlance, “vindictive,” requiring resentencing by another judge. See Brandful v. State, 858 So.2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Compare Ducks worth v. State, 26 So.3d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

¶2 Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded.

/35/so3d/1005 · .json · Public domain