¶1 While appellant Cesar Ruano argues on appeal that the prosecution improperly asked him on cross-examination whether another witness was lying, of., Knowles v. State, 632 So.2d 62, 65-66 (Fla.1993), the objection at trial was on the basis of “form” and “argumentative.” Because the defense failed to object on the basis that the prosecutor improperly asked Ruano whether he thought that a witness was lying, the issue was not preserved for appeal.
¶2 Affirmed.